:-----Original Message----- :From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf :Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 7:41 PM :To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Cc: [email protected] :Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) : :On Sun, 15 May 2005 12:20:25 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said: :> Stejerean, Cosmin wrote: :> :> > I think you are going a little overboard with this kind of :response. :> > The guy :> :> Nope. :> :> The guy is clearly a chopper. : :A perfect proof of why benign worms are a Bad Idea. I've :attached the Subject: :lines from the original thread, and the current sub-thread: : :Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms :Subject: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) : :If the *subject* line has sprouted a mutation from 'Benign' to :'Bening', why should we trust the *entire worm* not to mutate? ;) : :(And no - I do *NOT* want to hear "but I typed that one in by :hand" as an excuse or rationalization. The Subject: had a :mutation. And that's all that's important.) : :
Good point Valdis. A perfect proof that mutation can only produce useless information. The only hope for this thread would be the injection and help of intelligent design otherwise it will not survive. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
