[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK.. apparently a miscue - they're listed in the wrong zone - this should
be for the postmaster zone not the DSN zone.
They're in postmaster as well, with the same evidence.
There is however a requirement that if they *emit* mail that claims an origin
of @zproxy.gmail.com, that *somebody* accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So they're still not off the hook entirely.
True enough; though the "evidence" does NOT include an outbound message
which claims to be MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. So it's easy to
see what test failed and why, but what isn't obvious is why the test was
performed in the first place.
I'm not claiming they don't generate such mail. Just from the evidence
available, there's room for doubt.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
