oh, no. long time no m$ puppies whining publicly. On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 07:43:32PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I do not meen to flame you, but you are an irresponsible disgrace to the > hacking community. Do you not care about the customer? You never publicly > disclose details to a vulnerability of this magnitude. This is an image > vulnerability, for crying out loud. What's the first thing they tell you to > do when most vulnerability details are released? Disable active scripting. > That doesn't work here. What are the innocent, ignorant computer users going > to do? Disable images? I think not. You should be ashamed. >
i do not mean to flame you, but please stop smoking illegal stuff. why should lcamtuf care about m$ customers - m$ customers have deal with m$. it is a problem of m$, not of lcamtuf. does m$ care about free software customers? just check the m$ eula on the topic of "responsibility" and see the official party line of taking responsibility. what can m$ lusers do?: - call toll free support and ask what the fuck is going on, asking for a ticket number. - switch to a real os. about [EMAIL PROTECTED] - at least technically they are dumb and ignorant from personal experience. they don't care about bugs, bugs are a burden for them. they care about $$$. these same lamers continue to whine even if one reports a bug to them, but doesn't wait long enough for them to scratch their testicles. -- where do you want bill gates to go? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
