On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote: > J.A. Terranson wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote: > > > > *millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation. Nobody > > can assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is > > not completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so. > > Just because you have a copy doesn't mean the document is in public > view. The infowarrior.org URL no longer provides a copy of the trade > secrets to those who seek them, so the effort to control distribution is > working. Anyone who complies with the court order will delete their copy > of the document and forget what they have read.
I'm not talking about Infowarrior, nor am I discussing one copy. Hint: I didn't get my copy from Infowarrior. Nor have I seen any "order". > You are making an argument that the legal system doesn't work just > because you can disregard it at your own peril. That's nonsensical. Not at all, I'm stating the obvious: this is plain public view because it's "controlled distribution" failed on a massive scale which is irretrieveable on it's face. There are too many copies for even an attempt to fake it. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they are intended to support. don zweig, M.D. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
