On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jason Coombs wrote: > Chuck Fullerton wrote: > > "A Trojan horse is a program that appears to have some useful or benign > > purpose, but really masks some hidden malicious functionality." > > > > "A Backdoor is a program that allows attackers to bypass normal security > > controls on a system, gaining access on the attacker's own terms." > > Here's an example of a completely flawed explanation of the origin of > the term.
<snip> > Most (but not all) of you are suggesting that the only thing that > matters is what the definitions say, and that's not the right way to > look at this issue. Jason, we're friends (I think), and I generally respect your opinions, but if you were on the other side of the aisle with this tripe I'd roast you in front of the Judge (yes folks, most of these cases are heard in front of Judges, not Juries). The simple fact of the matter is that "what matters" *IS* the definition, and you full well know it. What happened here is you slipped and fell, and rather than admitting it you're crying foul - shame on you! You slipped - brush yourself off before you tarnish that sterling reputation of yours and move on. Oh, and *admit* when you're wrong: it works wonders for your credibility - even in front of Judges and Juries ;-) //Alif -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they are intended to support. don zweig, M.D. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
