Yeah, this is a late, late, *late* posting - I opened it last for some reason. Shoot me.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Erik Kamerling wrote: > Copied from the SANS Glossary of Terms Used in Security and Intrusion > Detection. > > http://www.sans.org/resources/glossary.php While I realize that this is not going to be a wildly popular point, let me remind you that SANS is not the kind of place I would use as an authoritative reference in terms of debate. SANS is a for profit corp., and was run as such even when they were playing possum as a non-profit. They are *not* a "disinterested third party" any more than the anti-virus firms are - and not many people would use *them* as an authoritative reference (assuming of course that there are other sources). -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they are intended to support. don zweig, M.D. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
