>>And how exactly do you propose to "leave out the details and PoC" when the presence of the bug and the steps taken to fix it can not be concelaed from public view given that the source code and the entire CVS entries are freely available for anyone to browse?
You really don't think it woudl slow them down? >>The proposal for obscurity serves well closed-source innitiatives and development processes that have limited or no public visibility but it fails in the presence of OSS. The "responsible disclosure" advocates act as if Linux,*BSD,Mozilla and a zillion other open source projects did not exist in reality. The Mozilla team obviously disagrees with you, since they do try to hide unresolved security problems, at least until (as in this case) the beans get spilled in some other way. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
