On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote: > >> Paul Laudanski > >> What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5 > are not vulnerable in the report. > > Funny Paul!! You are simple exaggerating upon the same point again and again > in a new style each time. Well, They don't even say that ZAP versions prior > to v5 are vulnerable in their advisory. Glad I made you laugh. We are at odds in this clearly. Zone Labs aka Cisco imvho has issued a fair and accurate release indicating what is not vulnerable and thereby conversely you know which products are. To that end... I move on. Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
