I will attempt to be brief. I think maybe you missed the point of the IMLogic statement. Stating that malware or exploits are targeted at a particular application or O/S does not infer that exploitation is successful at circumventing technical controls. It only asserts that the object is targeted.
In a later post another article was cited, in that article a different exploit vector was being exercised and the Yahoo! messenger was being used as a social engineering 'tool'. I don't think, personally, that anyone should be 'banned' or is not genuine in their desire to contribute to the community of list subscribers on FD. There is the occasional individual rant or self aggrandizement, but who is not guilty of that on occasion? Filter as required, peruse, repeat. -e On 10/14/05, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://n3td3v.blogspot.com/2005/10/imlogic-telling-porkies-about-yahoo.html > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
