On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  MAKING
THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY
DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE
GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS
LIST.  MODERATING WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND
WOULD BRING IT ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.

ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.
 
no need,
 
a) ban all gmail addresses
b) ban nicknames (real name only)
c) start inforcing list policy for trouble makers who attack legitimate researchers like netdev

 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to