I beleive that such moderated version should be given as an alternative when people subscribe to this list. I mean in the webpage or in the help mail. I also don't want this one to be moderated and I feel just fine with the messages sent but if anyone wants it filtered... Well why not, they have their rights and who knows If some day I feel that I need it maybe I switch. Who knows?
Regards
Waldo
On 12/16/05, James Longstreet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Michael Evanchik wrote:
> I second this
There's no point discussing it, or holding it to a vote. The purpose
of this list is to be unmoderated. The list owner has stated over
and over that that is the one point he will not concede on.
Kurt Seifried, among others, runs a moderated version of this list.
I can't vouch for its quality, since I'm not really interested in the
list being moderated. If you want moderation, look elsewhere. If
you don't want someone else moderating the list, learn about filters,
or even your 'D' key.
Calling for full-disclosure to be moderated is pointless and is
wearing out my 'D' key.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
