To all my friends in domestic and international surveillance: I am not in a position of proponency in respect to slaughtering the existing leaders of the United States government; I am just making some completely fictional speculation. No need to send the G-men to my home.
On 12/18/05, J.A. Terranson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
> Normally the correct response to this question is: go and vote, but
> with recent (and not so recent) events in the news:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2Bdiebold+%2Bgeorgia+%2Bcalifornia&btnG=Google+Search
>
> It seems this option is lost to us as well
this is the reason that those in power have been systematically disarming
Americans. Armed resistance was foreseen by our founding fathers - but we
just voluntarily gave up most of those rights a LONG ass time ago!
> Ideas? Maybe we could Hack the next "Election" err... counter-hack that is ;-)
Tim May had the right idea: Bush "needs to die". Unfortunately for all of
us, there's nobody around willing to "kill" him: the Courts don't give a
shit, Congress doesn't give a shit, and, most painfully, most of the
*country* doesn't give a shit.
We are a sorry bunch of losers here in the U.S....
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95BF
Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about
the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise?
- Steve Thompson
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
