On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, coderman wrote: > recent events have shown just how willing corporations are to give the > government a blank check with only minimal assurances of propriety and > legality. i would bet good money the number of core providers who > balked at DCS1000 deployments could be counted on a single hand, if > there were even any at all...
For the record (because I think it's important that "the record" reflect this odd fact), there were in fact major players who said "No". I know, I was there. Savvis, at least up to my departure, actively refused to go along (and yes, we *were* asked, and asked very early in the process). I suspect that the C&W merger may have changed that (although I have no physical proof of this, so I cannot be absolutely certain) later on, but at least *1* of the top ten carriers had clean hands as late as 2004. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF 'The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.' St. George Tucker _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/