Sorry Dick. Not FUD but Fact. The patch, if you are stupid enough to trust a third party patch in the first place, is not perfect. So tell me again why I should share why? Just wait for and trust your MS patch.. come on.. .would I lie to you? :P
On 1/3/06, Richard M. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why the FUD? Under what circumstances are you aware the patch doesn't work? > Hoarding information isn't very helpful in a situation like this. Are we > talking about .5%, 5%, or 50% failure mode for the patch? How does the > failure mode of the patch compare to Microsoft's solution of killing the > Microsoft Picture/FAX viewer which also has its limitations. (Example, > someone is using a different viewer program for .WMF files that also has the > flaw.) > > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: InfoSecBOFH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 6:35 AM > To: Gadi Evron > Cc: [email protected]; FunSec [List]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification > > So this patch is trusted because you said so? > > I have tested and confirmed that this patch only works in specific > scnenarios and does not mitigate the entire issue. Variations still work. > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
