i don't defend securityfocus either , it was just a example of moderated security related group. i think if you have to say something related to security it is good to post it on several newsgroups. when i post something valuable i post to FD and securityfocus. i don't care about their management staff or political orientations.
Randal T. Rioux wrote: > Javor Ninov wrote: >>> do you realize that your so-called popularity is based on the fact that >>> FD is not moderated ? strange .. i don't see you on securityfocus.com >>> >>> >>> n3td3v wrote: >>> >>>> No THINK required, IS BIG, FACT. >>>> > > Not to defend the mighty 'd3v, but securityfocus.com, aka Symantec, is > trash. They delete any posting to any of their owned lists that say even > the slightest bad thing about any of their weak products. > > Despite the trolls, FD is the last great pasture of free security > discussion. The securityfocus lists are for clueless management types > looking to pick up buzzwords for their next big useless presentation to > the CEOs. > > Randy _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
