netdev, That you inferred from my mail that I called you and idiot says a lot. Those are not my words and I did not call you an idiot. I did call out that there is a netdev in every crowd with netdev == undesirable in this case. I also opined that FD is a great training ground for learning how to deal with idiots, this does not necessarily make you one. I personally think you are in need of attention and/or have an undisclosed agenda.
All, I think that it is foolish to expect anything else from a segment of the population subscribed to the list. If the signal to noise ratio is too high there is the excellent aggregated list without the noise run by Seifried and it can be found over here => https://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/security Fortunately most people have learned how to filter mail involving netdev so the noise ratio for them is pretty low these days. I don't have to feel bad for adding to it. At least I'm adding some alternative forum in my post instead of complaining. n3td3v wrote: > The only people driving off quality discussion and people are the folks > complaining that posters don't meet their standard of intellect and > disclosure policy and presentation of vulnerabilities. > > But keep calling netdev an idiot, you'll go far in your career. > > > On 3/21/06, *Jason* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote: > > Frederic, > > Your reaction is the intent of the spam and porn and trolling. It is in > an attempt to drive off quality discussion and people. If you cannot > keep up with it we all understand. > > I personally consider this list great training for handling the idiots > that exist in every day life. There is a netdev in every crowd. > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
