> So you are basically saying open source free software can't be trusted to > hold high standards or be reliable or secure if I don't pay for it?
I don't think his argument had anything to do with open source. He was talking about payment, or lack thereof. You can give away binaries for free as well. And I'm not implying that the rest of your conclusions about his statement is accurate, either. Just had to point out that one flaw. tim _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
