Wow, hence the ideals of being an anonymous group. Like if names were put to list, they wouldn't be sacked straight away... Wake up, smell the postitives of being anonymous for five minutes, or maybe that leaves you, CERT, SANS a bit head rubbed, just like SANS once said FIREFOX posed a lesser threat that IE. OH, the guys I speak to at MS were chuckling about that one. Of course SANS reversed their claim that FIREFOX was less vulnerable than IE later, much later. The credibility of SANS, of course comes into questions, while folks at n3td3v c onsortium laugh with glee, as the big players get it so badly wrong infront of the international stage.

On 3/26/06, William Lefkovics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not to mention the absence of legitimate names of the folks.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Hoye
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap
PatchTuesday for Critical flaws

On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:39:32AM +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually people
> from MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already.

You know, legitimate groups don't have to keep claiming, over and over, that
they're legit.

It's remarkable how that works.

--
"Totally mad. Utter nonsense. But we'll do it because it's brilliant
nonsense." - Douglas Adams

_______________

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Reply via email to