Actually, I have posted my opinion on this topic in the past on more appropriate sites - but I wont regurgitate any of that here as this is not the appropriate forum - since there anything new to actually "disclose".
This issue is administrative - not obfuscated info or lack of product or issue disclosure. So again I put it to you, this is not a security alert - as there is nothing to "alert" us about. This isn't new. We know the issue and understand its ramifications. On 3/28/06, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No security alert? Unofficial patches is very much a security alert. You say > i'm not adding anything to the list, but what are *you* adding, apart from > off-topic bitch remarks about thread authors. When you have the confidence > to post your opinion on the actual topic, then i'll be glad to hear from > you. > > > > On 3/28/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Patch Tuesday = Good before third party patches appear > Third party patch = Evil > Patch Tuesday = Bad for everyone after third party patches appear, > even Microsoft... > > Ahh, but you forgot one: > > n3td3v = Annoying. Posting as an individual or as a "group"... > > Your "security alert" has offered nothing in terms of Full Disclosure > or any actual security alert. You'd be better served to send your > "opinion" to the Patch Management list. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > -- ME2 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
