Dear technically challenged netdev,
1) 'Is
that the same as...' - ummm... you probably IMAGINED a different
email to which you replied to
2) The address is legit, it isn't 'hacked'. It
has a story why I use it here, but it's not like anybody
cares.
3) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt -
the world is bigger than gmail believe it or not.
4) If I sent the email from gmail, it would show
in the headers.
5) If
it was a spoofed email only used for subscription, the FD posts
sent to it would not get back to me
6) The email in question wasn't even an FD comment, it went
straight to your inbox to avoid bugging others who still don't have you filtered
(like me, until this very email). What did you do? Post it right back to the
list. Nice.
Sure, everybody can filter, so can I. The thing is, i never NEEDED to, because
there hasn't been anybody dropping such ignorance in my mailbox so often.
I
was hoping that you would either turn normal or keep your word and leave the
list.
Since
the trolling just goes on, it's grep -v for you, especially after
this stupid bullcrap you made up and decided to share with the probably
not-so-interested list members. I responded this time because 1) it was a
personal attack based on nothing, and 2) because it's my last email that has the
word netdev in it. (sent or received ;]) - and i can keep my word, unlike 'some
people'.
php0t
-----Original Message-----Is that the same as hacking someones "domain", accepting the Gmail confirmation to say you're allowed to send from a Gmail account with that hacked domain, then delete all forensic logs from the hacked domain and then go back to your Gmail account, where you can continue to send your inflamed FD comments from as [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Figures.
From: n3td3v [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:12 PM
To: php0t; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
On 3/31/06, php0t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:If you kept your word (and didn't post my emails back to the list), it'd be better. :)-----Original Message-----Why don't you just "filter" me like "the experts" have told you to do? Or haven't you worked out the technical background architecture of Outlook and Thunderbird yet? Figures.
From: n3td3v [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:47 PM
To: php0t; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
On 3/31/06, php0t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:For real, please keep your word.-----Original Message-----This is funny as well, http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID=131539&start=-1&reply=true I almost choked on my big mac after reading this one, the guy thinks if you take down a site, the phisher's script doesn't deploy another premade site straight away on another host. lol, maybe the RSA have miscalculated the pre plainning and programming of a phishing attack backend before its carried out. I guess they just thought phishing was down to "dumb criminals".
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
On 3/31/06, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Check out this article, and I really did spill my hard earned Starbucks right down my front when I looked at this article:
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
