|
While I’m not normally one to reply
to this list… I can’t stand to see this go on any further. Don’t
expect another response as I don’t have the time (other than late Friday night)
to sit and respond to this drivel.. n3td3v: How do you figure on this single user
Microsoft Windows XP computer?? Last time I checked Windows XP was a
multi-user environment… Also… if it’s not a botnet it must be
Windows… that’s a rather childish thought…. Also a botnet has
negative connotations.. That is to say, it’s a group of PCs under the
control of a single individual or group. This group of PCs (Zombies) are used
mostly for illegal purposes, or on IRC networks (different sort of botnet…
where the name was derived from). What makes you think that RSA has a single
IP… that’s a pretty foolhardy belief. They aren’t some kid on
a cable modem. In fact, a quick search of ARIN, assuming only RSA Security
shows they have several net blocks ---SNIP--- RSA Security Inc. RSA-SECURITY-C1
(NET-192-80-211-0-1) 192.80.211.0 - 192.80.211.255 RSA Security Inc. RSA-SECURITY
(NET-216-162-240-0-1) 216.162.240.0 - 216.162.255.255 RSA Security Inc. UU-63-84-35-192-D4
(NET-63-84-35-192-1) 63.84.35.192 - 63.84.35.223 RSA SECURITY UU-65-216-28-32-D7
(NET-65-216-28-32-1) 65.216.28.32 - 65.216.28.39 RSA SECURITY UU-65-214-232-56-D3
(NET-65-214-232-56-1) 65.214.232.56 - 65.214.232.63 RSA Security UU-65-221-107
(NET-65-221-107-0-1) 65.221.107.0 - 65.221.107.255 Rsa Security Inc SBC066123220136030905
(NET-66-123-220-136-1) 66.123.220.136 - 66.123.220.143 RSA Security, Inc. QWEST-IAD-RSA1
(NET-63-150-186-0-1) 63.150.186.0 - 63.150.186.255 RSA Security, Inc. QWEST-IAD-RSA
(NET-66-77-65-208-1) 66.77.65.208 - 66.77.65.223 ---SNIP--- The odds are that others involved in this
will contribute machines on their networks.. and that RSA owns blocks not listed
above… servers setup on these blocks running the software will submit
information to the pages… This is not a botnet… If this is a botnet
then the worlds SMTP servers are a huge botnet… oh yeah and the Root DNS
servers must be a botnet… We’re not asking a lot here.. just
that you think a little and approach this from at least somewhat of a technical
understanding… Others have already pointed out why this
will work from a banks point-of-view and others on why phishers are not
automated… I’m now showing you why this isn’t some big
illegal botnet… and how it’s a completely legal operation…. I’d
bet that by inviting hackers… RSA is saying run the software… Think
of it as distributed computing… Is that a big illegal botnet as well?? Peace, From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v If the RSA aren't using a
bot network, then are you suggesting they are sending garbage data from one
single user Microsoft Windows XP computer.... to all the worlds phishing
logins? Wake up mr se cur ity at hotmail dot com On 4/1/06, Morning
Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: >*while RSA are carrying out these attacks, is it legally OK for
hackers to -- -- |
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
