On 4/19/06, Randal T. Rioux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does SF offer?
People directly post to Securityfocus, it is an original source of information, whereas "Please note: The information, which this Secunia Advisory is based upon, comes from third party" Aka they sit on places like Securityfocus all day looking for advisories to republish and "verify". I don't think the industry needs someone to "verify" an advisory for them. "Secunia collects, validates, and verifies all vulnerability reports issued by security research groups, vendors, and others." People are more than capable of doing that themselves, or do Secunia underestimate the intelligence of the security community? If we were to wait everytime for Secunia to harvest advisories from public 0-day sources, and verify them manually, then the internet would be shutdown by now. This is my last ever Full-Disclosure post... i'm no longer going to give Secunia the spam satisfaction of adding their web address to the bottom of my messages. Good bye to the All-New Secunia sponsored Full-dIsclosure mailing list. Please unsubscribe n3td3v_at_gmail and xploitable_at_gmail Thanks, n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
