Agreed. The whole point of Full-Disclosure is to be unmoderated, and it would contribute nothing to the security community if it were moderated, because good moderates lists, like Bugtraq, already exist. Those who want an unmoderated list instead of Full Disclosure are free to leave. Even better, those who want to limit any content they consider worthless can set mail filters accordingly. I strongly oppose making Full Disclosure a moderated list.
-Eliah On 5/19/06, evilrabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If for some reason this guy gets taken seriously and his request actually gets considered. I would like to say I wouldn't like a moderated list.. If I did I'd be looking at bugtraq right now. On 5/19/06, Aaron Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Regarding some previous threads. > > Some people just show how low they are ! > > This is why we need some form of "Code of Conduct" or even better change to a moderated list. > > Otherwise the whole list just gets ruined and will ndeteriate over time. > > Heres a call for moderation before it gets too late. > > Anything that is too off topic or inflamatory should get junked. > > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > -- -- h0 h0 h0 -- www.nopsled.net _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
