On 5/19/06, Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are a lot of moderated lists.
This isn't moderated.
That is the point of this list.
Don't be an idiot, just because there are a few idiots about doesn't mean
that you should call for a fd->bugtraq change.
On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
On Fri, 19 May 2006 14:48:59 PDT, Daniel Veditz said:
> Aaron Gray wrote:
> > Heres a call for moderation before it gets too late.
>
> I've lost my chart, can anyone remind me how many drinks that rates on
> the Full-Disclosure drinking game? Something like two, plus one for
> every ten replies?
At that rate, you're looking at a case, maybe a case and a half of tequila
already.
And I quote, from
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-September/036962.html
"And if you want a moderated subset of this list you can go to:
https://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/security
And subscribe to my security list (includes BugTraq, Full-Disclosure,
multiple vendor lists).
-Kurt"
Kurt, at one time, had a list dedicated to only full-disclosure, which
was full-disclosure-moderated. That list was apparently merged into
his moderated security list. (
http://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure-moderated )
Now let's just end this thread and whomever wants a moderated version
can subscribe to the aforementioned list. You will also note, that in
the moderated+combined list that this entirely useless and offtopic
thread is missing.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
