On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, David Taylor wrote: > > I guess our disconnect on this is my lack of knowledge on how the actual > exploits get submitted. I think I just assumed it was the person that > discovered the vulnerability and/or developed the exploit that submits it to > places like Milw0rm. >
The problem is, they are not the only ones. > > On 6/24/06 9:11 AM, "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Once again we are mostly in agreement, but there is one point I do > > disagree on completely. > > > > How would having the vulnerability being exploited by Bad Guys already, > > who get it via their sources, while not letting the Good Guys know about > > and put pressure on the vendor to fix help out? > > > > Like I said earlier, this isn't black and white and some vendors do things > > right, still, the one thing about Full Disclosure no one can dispute, > > despite whatever else it may be - it works. > > > > Now how is the exploits being out and just us not knowing about them help > > us any? The ones who use the for harm will do so regardless. > > > > Gadi. > > > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
