[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >n3td3v said: > > > > This is highly irresponsible of F-Secure and they should be held > > legally responsible if the information they release in relation to > > their "Netscape hacked" blog entry is used maliciously. > > You might want to review what you've posted to lists > regarding vulnerabilities, > and ask yourself - if F-Secure gets held to some legal > standard of liability. > where do you end up yourself? > > I don't know who's going to end up the test case/poster child > for vulnerability > liability - but it's much more likely to be an individual > that posts to > this list and can't afford a lawyer than a corporation with > deep pockets > like F-Secure....
:) n3td3v's mouth is going to get her in trouble one of these days. Curt Purdy CISSP, GSNA, GSEC, CNE, MCSE+I, CCDA Information Security Officer Information Systems Security infosysec.net 443.846.4231 ------------- If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
