that's exactly what i meant.... cheers m0rla
Dude VanWinkle wrote: > On 8/2/06, Matt Burnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The charter says the list is supposed to be "self-policing". How do >> we take action against offending members, short of a d0s? The charter >> also says that management can remove members for "spamming" or >> "misappropriation". Have anyone from management read any of n3td3v's >> posts? Am i the only on who considers n3td3v's posts to libel? >> Couldnt his/her advertising his/her own list be considered spam. I >> really want to know how a group can be self-policing if they have no >> ability to take action? > > > John already kicked that guy off. Didnt seem to work very well. > > I removed all emails with the word "n3td3v" in the headers, subject, > or body, and that seemed to kill all the threads relating to, started > by, or people complaining about the guy. I disabled them after a while > because I like a good laugh every now and then. > > On busy weeks I re-enable the filter. > > -JP > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
