Jason wrote: > Matt Burnett wrote: >> You really think this would be hard to design. Think about how most spam >> solutions work, if you get 25 posts in hour with 100k attachments from a >> new user, do you think they are talking about security or are they >> posting porn. Anything a spam filter would consider suspicous could be >> flaged for moderator approval. Its not 100% fool proof but do you really >> think some 16 year old kid whos posting porn here would take the time to >> try to defeat it, in order just to post crappy porn?
> Wonderful. I suggest that you get or develop this technology for > yourself and offer it to others. > Have you done the analysis of the images yet? I quote the challenge > again for your and the lists benefit. > "Are you an expert? Have you done an analysis of the porn? What were > your findings? Are there any hidden messages? Disclosures? Patterns? > Trends?" > The next target of a terrorist plot could be embedded in there somewhere > just waiting for you to discover it. What's your problem? Who cares about that? A simple filter would do the job: example 1: mail contains attachment -> attachment is image (WE HAVE FILE EXTENSIONS - GUYS) -> let mod approve it or delete them How often do you send images to a security related list? Not often, i guess. example 2: more than 10 mails per hour -> let mod approve it/ delay delivery >> >> If implemented properly it would not limit the free exchange of SECURITY >> RELATED information, but would limit the exchange of porn on FD. You >> dont think a couple thousand security people, most of whom are strong >> supporters of privacy rights/civil rights/etc couldnt devise a proper >> system that would not impead the exchange of security related information? >> Anyways what legal issues are you talking about, be specific. For one i >> know that it is against nearly all American corporate internet use >> policies to look at porn. So some 16 year old kid could potentialy get >> someone fired for sending porn on FD. Hows that for a legal issue. > If you are on a corporate network and subscribed to FD using corporate > resources without the authority and justification to do so then you > deserve to be terminated. It has nothing to do with porn and is just as > likely to have the same effect for downloading copyrighted content, > exploits, "dangerous material", viruses... In my country it's absolutaly legit to check their own e-mails as long as your work is not disturbed. Hint: Check mails while you take a break. Btw. mails are treated as private so nobody cares what they contain. Virii, trojans, spam, ... are usuallly filtered. < removed other crap, nobody cares about > Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
