RE: [Full-disclosure] CC evaluation

[Clement Dupuis]

Obviously this is a paragraph extracted out of context from some documents.   By itself it is totally wrong but it might make sense if we have access to the whole document.   Depending on the EAL level being sought you might not even look at the design process or development process at all.  Only the higher level would require this.   Can you tell us where the paragraph was extracted from?   Take care   Clement     From: Nguyen Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 6:32 AM To: pen-test@securityfocus.com; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk Subject: [Full-disclosure] CC evaluation   Hi all, Could you please give your comments on the following point: "CC is an evaluation of design methods, not an evaluation of security functionality. It is the system development process that is being evaluated, not the system itself. This means that the given EAL only states whether a larger enough pile of paperwork over the design process exists or not. The correctness and importance of those papers doase not even have to be verified and examined". Thanks for your helps, Nguyen Pham.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/