[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
====================================
If you consider that America are
able to lie about the weapons of mass
destruction and then admit it,
====================================
"America" never lied about WMD.
America is not in a position to prove that any WMD stockpiles
existed past December of 1998, when Saddam kicked out the UN; but
at worst that makes them wrong, not liars.
You're right, America never lied about WMD. Our neo-fascist
administration did. Argue against that to your own peril. It's pretty
well documented at this point and others of a more recognized and
respected ilk have made the case better than I ever could...
=====================================
use chemical weapons in Iraq and lie
about it and then admit it
=====================================
America did not use Nerve Agents or Blister Agents in Iraq.
Nerve Agents and Blister Agents are "Chemical Waepons".
Smoke Generators and tear gas are not. Unless of course you are
seeking to redefine the word to fit a political agenda.
Technicality: perhaps not in the military, but many doctors and chemists
consider tear gas to be a nerve agent as it does have some of the
effects of nerve agents, just not the extreme effects we think about
when we think about chemical weapon WMDs. But there are many cases
where exposure to tear gas has caused long-lasting, sometimes lifelong,
effects on the nervous system.
I think you two are using different definitions for Chemical Weapons,
perhaps.
-bkfsec
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
