Has anyone tested these against the (very) recent MS patch? -JP
On 9/26/06, H D Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice work Aviv! All of these methods, along with a few extras, are > implemented in the Metasploit 2.6 version of this module. Last I checked, > not a single AV or IPS could pick it up. This module should work on every > version and service pack of Windows. > > http://metasploit.com/projects/Framework/exploits.html#ie_vml_rectfill > > -HD > > On Tuesday 26 September 2006 09:04, avivra wrote: > > I've used 5 simple methods, trying to evade being detected by the > > signature: 1) I've replaced the location where EIP should jump when the > > exploit is activated, with a different valid address. > > 2) I've replaced the VML element from "rect" with one of the other VML > > elements. 3) I've replaced the payload with a different valid shell > > code. 4) I've replaced the namespace key with a random key. > > 5) A combination of all of the above. > > > > Please note that when I changed the code using any of the methods, the > > exploit still worked. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
