On 10/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Might want to read up on the *facts* in the hot-coffee case. The woman only > sued because (a) the coffee was *dangerously* hot - she got 3rd degree burns > from it, and (b) McDonald's refused to pay for the medical expenses, including > skin grafts, and (c) they found over 700 other cases of people severely burned > by the coffee.
Indeed, it is intriguing how many people think nothing of passing self-righteous judgement about things they have taken no time or effort to learn about. Whether spouting out hateful political propaganda of one slant or another, judging a legal case without doing even the most basic research on the case, or making security decisions for their companies, people do this time and again... -Eliah _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
