On 10/29/06, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/28/06, gabriel rosenkoetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:24:40AM +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote: > > > Have you ever header of Skype API that basicly allows two application to > > > communicate on top of Skype network, thus inheriting Skype resilience, > > > encryption, obfuscation and firewall punching capapbilities ? > > > > I don't see how this isn't still an HR problem. > > It is an HR problem. It's also an IT problem. Neither group can > solve the issue without help from the other. And both groups need > buy-in from the rest of the organization if they expect to make the > solution stick.
Good troll. I think that filtering a program like this, HR or IT, will prevent a lot of problems, because of his closing-encrypted-nonRE source. I find this closed politic-protocol-program too dangerous to let it run in my network. I need to match it on a gate, and I haven't found any "usefull" informations. Thx to the list for the discussion. -- Tyop? "And excuse my english." _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
