On 3/23/07, Michael Silk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/23/07, Dave No, not that one Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:45:19PM +0300, 3APA3A wrote: > > >> Dear Michael Silk, > > >> > > >> First, by reading 'crack' I thought lady can recover full > > >> message by it's signature. After careful reading she can bruteforce > > >> collisions 2000 times faster. > > > > > > Both of you guys are confused. > > > > > > First off Michael: this is old news. It doesn't seem to indicate that > > > finding collisions is any faster than 2^63, which was reported quite > > > some time ago[1]. > > > > It's not just old news, but old old news, since we already had this > > discussion about how it was old news back in january when the piece was > > published... > > > yes yes yes. i have a bad memory. i don't read articles before posting them. > anyone else want to take a shot?
OK.. your parents have a questionable heritage. there, take that buddy! -JP _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
