maybeso, but that does not come from the company. Blackmail requires some sort of "or else". Unilateral release of info might match a description of "reckless endangerment", but not blackmail.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 11:34 AM To: Everhart, Glenn (Card Services) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY TWELVE On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:15:57 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > No money or valuables demanded ==>no blackmail. Remember that in this industry, getting named as the first person to discover an exploit is a "valuable". ----------------------------------------- This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
