Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], --Tuesday, July 24, 2007, 5:02:16 PM, you wrote to [email protected]:
jkc> It seems to me the average SNR here could be greatly improved with any jkc> one of several commonly available "community-based" filtering jkc> mechanisms. Digg and Slashdot are both examples of what I'm suggesting. This subject arises here twice an year. List needs _professional_ moderation, like Bugtraq has. because: 1. Next thing to research will be attacks against community-based filtering mechanisms. 2. No, thanks, see enough "community moderators" things with Wikipedia, where sense of good always hits common sense. It's well known who has high desire to moderate: not a professional with deep topic knowledge. Michael Zalewski was filtered from "hackers" for few years for self-promotion (Was it Stallman who edited this article or 15-year schoolboy who read nothing but few articles about... let me remember.. Melissa worm?). Bad for you, Michael, you promote yourself again! I was not able to add article about free open source software, as I am only listed software developer (I really am): it's promotion. Just wonder: if somebody looks for specific software in Wikipedia, is it better to have potentially promotional article from it's developer or do not have article at all? -- ~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
