Good point! I didn't like the intro that much, it will be revisted in the next revision :-) Thanks for the feedback!
-HD On Thursday 09 August 2007 19:24, Hernan Ochoa wrote: > The only thing I would argue is the concept that your paper is actually > 'INTRODUCING a tactical approach to penetration testing', 'Revisiting' > would be much more accurate in my opinion. I don't think your approach > is new. Having said that, I do think, like I said, that your paper > comes at the right time because the proliferation of 'explotation > frameworks' and their (commonly) direct association with 'penetration > testing' can mislead people to believe that penetration testing is > only that. So congrats again :). _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
