-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 None of you are lawyers.
SHUT UP VLADIS. On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:44:08 -0400 Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 10/10/07, Ray P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Would the _intended_ recipient have a case against the sender >for >> contractual failure to protect confidential information (or >whatever) if the >> _un_intended recipient posts it somewhere or otherwise discloses >its >> contents? >> > >I'm surprised we don't see more disclaimers with a copyright >statement in >them. I would think that using copyright law as an argument >against >unauthorized distribution of an email would stand a better chance >in court >than a non-binding disclaimer at the bottom of the message. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Charset: UTF8 Version: Hush 2.5 wpwEAQECAAYFAkcOMFIACgkQ+dWaEhErNvSA6gP/Tgggjw8KZNPI9M33XtjfyvBS5URq kRafaMsPfvDcKsRcaNB30zhou3Me1VVG2LuwchOhh1vIss0aPzT8Bq7lgULZiKqOxX19 /L8xfYgHptayeqrNqSYMg4lsl2J/Q1gQTvWf4EPkk+WcakChTuCJdzA/zZfuAIsTTihY bjtJ+Yg= =fqcX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
