Whoops and sorry Richard! I thought you were referring to the conversation between netdev([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and netdev([EMAIL PROTECTED]). It is obvious from reading further you were referring to netdev's threat of bodily harm to Gadi.
once again, sorry about the mess-up -JP<the infallible> On 10/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/13/07, worried security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/13/07, Richard Golodner <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why don't you keep this offline between you and full-disclosure? I know > > Valdis and he does not give a damn about any of this sophomoric stuff. When > > you post legitimate security information your credibility is increased as > > well as the amount of respect you receive amongst the security community. > > Take this as friendly advice and nothing more. You should not threaten to > > play games as you may not be aware of who is reading this stuff. I know NSA, > > Interpol and FBI personnel who read this but will never reveal themselves, > > but you expose yourself to possible investigation by making threats. And > > that is never a good idea. > > I dont think that The Douchebag can be charged with threatening himself... > > You do realize that some trolls register multiple accounts on the same > mailing list so that they can have the benefit of annoying everyone > else while only talking to themselves. This is done in order to make > people like you think that there is a serious discussion going on. > > -JP<[EMAIL PROTECTED] boyee'> > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
