> Thank you, Captain Obvious - I specifically *said* that only one of them > needs to be blind spoofing. > >> only possible if sequence number is 100% (or close to 100%) predictable. > > And Michael Zalewski's work showed that even on many boxes that *claim* > to have RFC1948 randomization, you can do pretty well on the predicting. >
Seriously. Enough with the asterisks. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
