Hi, Florian Echtler さんは書きました:
> Just to make myself clear: I don't think it is a viable option to create > email noise, I just pointed out that it makes more sense than TCP/HTTP > noise. There is already enough email noise thanks to spam. It might make sense to reply to some of it though, to create the illusion of a fully connected network (i.e. poison the data). > As for using encryption: the fact that communication has happened (with > respect to email, at least) can't be hidden, at least not if one or both > ends of the communication are with a big public email provider. Well, it might make sense to finally get a standard for email headers within the easily encryptable data bits, so the outer message headers would show only communication between some gateway service and the communications endpoint. Of course, there is always the option of a P2P darknet. :-) Simon _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
