On Dec 8, 2007 2:32 PM, Fetch, Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > It's this lack of "last mile" security that some will suggest using an > encrypted proxy but that still may not resolve the issue of the > requested destination not supporting a secure connection.
Public wireless anyone? None of the big sites are willing to invest in your privacy. at least with gmail i can filter http and stay on https (yes, the cookie is still not secure only, *sigh*). treat Tor like an anonymizing hot spot. if you're worried about any of the content being sent, make sure it is encrypted end to end. > Hiding behind/through Tor and an encrypted proxy just puts more layers > of obfuscation into the mix but still doesn't provide any more security. Tor != transport privacy. the sooner everyone realizes this the better... [and the less we have to read about lame ass fame whores like Egerstad pimping their dsniff stupidity. the control port hack was much more interesting...] _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
