The evil .gov are gonna subpoena hushmail for his identity because he told the sec review guy things about a company no one cares about... Oh noes!
On Dec 20, 2007 6:32 PM, coderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007 4:06 PM, Dude VanWinkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > WTF are you taking about Don? Of course hushmail is completely anonymous ! > > > > http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/11/pgp-creator-def.html > > that shit makes me laugh so hard... > > transitive trust in some singular unknown *business* entity, whose > motives and reasoning center around *profit* and not loyalty, is > foolishness in spades. > > anonymity requires large scale decentralized participation. anything > else is just imitating... > > [i'd like to delve into a detailed discussion of privacy and/or > anonymity, and the difference between them, but this hard copy of the > latest SecReview just printed and awaits my frottage... OH YESZ] > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
