eW91IGNhbiBwYXkgdXMgdG8gd2hvcmUgeW91ciBjb21wYW55Cg== The interesting thing is that they don't seem to be reviewing large companies... perhaps they are interested in extorting the smaller ones??? Just a thought, not an accusation.
Nate On 1/21/08, J. Oquendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SecReview wrote: > > Nate, > > Your email was constructive and much appreciated. We'll go over > > the review a second time and incorporate some of your suggestions. > > Thank you for taking the time to provide so much good feedback. > > > > Hey all, I'd like to get into reviewing security companies as well. > Before I do though I'd appreciate it if someone could provide me > with information on the differences betweens statistical sampling > over judgmental sampling. I wouldn't want to write a review that > could affect someone's livelihood without knowing what the differences > are between say change management and mitigation management. > > And to the older security folks on the list keeping quiet (not those > between the ages of tenteen and 19): > > eW91IGNhbiBwYXkgdXMgdG8gd2hvcmUgeW91ciBjb21wYW55Cg== > > Cheap too! > > > > -- > ==================================================== > J. Oquendo > > SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) > SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) > > wget -qO - www.infiltrated.net/sig|perl > > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E > > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
