Inline On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:02 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why do I get a feeling you're trying to take me on, good luck with > that by the way... i dont know why you feel that way. you tell me how you feel. how am i supposed to know how you feel? im not taking you on, i dont care. > yes you've managed to grasp i'm political, now are > you stepping forward to be a serious contender against n3td3v? no, no one is 'challenging' you. i am just sharing my views, as is everyone else on the list about you. it seems pretty negative at this point. > Well > you've got a lot of catching up to do, I have 9 years of networked > contacts and political power base built up in the security community > and is continuing to grow. and? i havent seen any major corporations (or anything) step up to support you either. all i see is that you are full of hotair/wind/talk/noise/repostings. > Politically i'm years ahead than you, so if > you're going to take me on as yourself then you don't seem like a > strong opposition. how do you know that you are ahead of me? assumption? or cockiness? > > > The only group that is near in size that's already took n3td3v on > politically was Funsec group, they post a sophisticated smear campaign > against n3td3v headed by Neal Krawetz in the form of a PDF report, and > they still couldn't win political points. So what's chance has > "Ureleet" got? who says i am trying to win anything? i'm just sharing my opinion, the same as you shuld be doing, but instead you are trying to have a pissing contest with the community. i read dr krawetz's paper, i thought it was interesting, and i did observe some interesting things about you. especially in terms of your writing style. some times its correct, sometimes its not. i think dr krawetz's paper is interesting, i am not sure if its correct. nor do i care. > > You're nothing compared to Funsec group, and they weren't a good > enough contender, so are you going to form a "Ureleet group"? you assume i am nothing, and i have no need to form a group, again, i dont care. just sharing my opinion, and trying to understand why no one (that i have seen on here) believes or listens to you. im not saying that someone doesn't listen to you, somewhere, but i havent seen it here. no, i am not going to ask you for proof, because im not participating in the pissing contest you are presently having with everyone else. and a ureleet group is just absurd. laughable at best. sad that n3td3v is a group, and can't be just a person. > I've > been looking for cyber security political groups to step forward to > create a cyber security political circuit for a while, like the webcam rings of the late 90's? sweet. > its been boring > that its only n3td3v group and Funsec group on the circuit so far, so > I welcome you to setup your own political party, and take me or Funsec > group on. i don't care. said it. > > Maybe you should join arms with Funsec group, thats your only chance > dude, but I don't think you've got the will power and political > knowhow to take me on since of what i'm already sitting on and you > appear to be a noob to the political scene taking me on. im not going to ask you to define noob, because that then would elicit a response from you... i have no need to join a group. i participate in the things i find interesting. you, presently, are interesting. simply because you are so... i don't know.. i can't think of the word > > As far as i'm aware you're somebody working on your own, and you're > not part of any political groups, so you're not going to be taken as a > serious contender against n3td3v. fine, i'm not a 'warring faction' against n3tdev. dont care to be, dont know why you want me to be. > > I suggest you unsubscribe from n3td3v group if you don't like it and > are against it so publically. im not against it, i am just glad i know where you stand now., as i said. > > > The president of Funsec group is Gadi Evron, you should know him... i do. > > you're currently talking to the president of n3td3v. So Ureleet, step > forward, form a political group, then come back and speak to me. nah. meh. > > > http://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v spam. > <http://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v> > > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec spam. > <https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec> > > [Ureleet political party goes here?] [EMAIL PROTECTED] thats all i need. > > You're either with Funsec or you're with n3td3v, make your decision or > setup your own political group to take both of our groups on. or i am all by myself like most people. another word for group is gang. do you feel the need to be part of a gang? create warring factions?? wtf is wrong with you. > > > All the best, thank you. > > > n3td3v >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
