gadi has a different set of issues. at least hes just self absorbed, you are just a moron.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about Gadi Evron threadjacks? He is as bad as me: > > Impressive vulnerability, new. Not a 0day. > > Not to start an argument again, but fact is, people stop calling > everything a 0day unless it is, say WMF, ANI, etc. exploited in the wild > without being known. > > I don't like the mis-use of this buzzword. > > Gadi. > > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-September/056846.html > > http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/480093/100/0/threaded > > Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able > to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean. > > What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of > previous definitions? > > Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years with > the targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc. > > We require a term to address these, just as much as we do "unpatched > vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability". > > What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding? > non-disclosure? > > Gadi. > > http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/480611/100/0/threaded > > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-September/057005.html >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
