Valdis, On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:57:12 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:41 EDT, Joey Mengele said: >> I think you are mistaken. Perhaps you have an outdated version >of >> the document in question? > >No, it is you that is sadly mistaken. > >IETF RFCs are not versioned. If substantial changes are made, the >document is re-issued with a new number. And you'd know that if >you >had actually spent any significant time reading RFCs. > >
Exactly, I was talking about the RFC that supersedes that particular RFC. I think we all know that RFCs are not versioned. Now you take your foot out LOLOL. J -- Click for travel nursing jobs and see the world. http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4eKQItpggHPvgd7FHoESjvrEHJZJztO723kagEgTlsI4adNO/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
