Valdis, On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:53:55 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:31:53 EDT, Joey Mengele said: > >> So are you trying to suggest compression is not as secure as >> encryption? Have you even *read* the RFC in question? > >The design goal of most compression algorithms is that *anybody* >can take >the compressed data and get back the original. The design goal of >most >encryption is that *only the intended recipient* can decrypt and >get the >original data back. >
I think you have your terms mixed up, insert foot here LOLOL. And you didn't answer my question. Have you even *read* the RFC in question? And please, no "you must work at a fast food restaurant" cop outs this time. J -- Free information on medical billing software from respected companies. Click here. http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4fneCwTKcl0y4kBwm4nw7Q7sY2zT1YkvrmeeUrjqavwIIO8Y/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
