Indeed. There is no such thing as secure. Security is a process, one that never ends. If it did, many of us would be out of a job. ;)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:01 AM, G. D. Fuego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Joey Mengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > wishi, > > > > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:19:46 -0400 wishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >I thought exactly the same. Security is a process. If someone > > >doesn't > > >understand, that it's better to know the vulnerabilities to > > >defend, he > > >didn't understand it. > > > > > > > I think you have this mixed up. Security a destination, not a > > process. > > > > > > If that was true then the system you secure today would be safe untouched a > year from now or the year after that. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
