very well said :) I guess bullshit and made up stats are acceptable since everyone else is doing it.
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:49 PM, don bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Robert McGuire wrote: > | I don't believe remaining anonymous invalidates comments, just seems > unnecessary, much like FUD. > | > | Can't argue with reepex, FUD is unnecessary and utterly transparent so > you have to wonder why every company in the "industry" perpetuates it. > It's counterproductive in fact, makes my job more difficult so were it > up to me it wouldn't be a part of our message. > | > | If either of you have better insight regarding the impact, cost, > effect of spam please share. > | > > Well now that you're admitting that FUD is part of your business model > I'm saddened that this e-mail isn't to a public mailing list. I'm sure > many professionals would be interested in your ethics. Blaming other > companies in the security industry is child's play and only serves > to make you look foolish. > > I find it extremely laughable that you are attempting to redirect this > discussion to "the impact, cost, effect of spam". Our focus is your > company's blatant use of fake "facts" to push your product. Do you > really think you're talking to adolescents? I'm not distracted by > your shiny nickel. Either stay on topic or end the conversation. > > D > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkgmbKsACgkQttfe3HwtctNreACgkS4VrTOS00qxmdnFigrXmnHW > lK0AnjYr1Ob52O6nlM2pZJsPOr0H9Dlz > =tNH1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
